Authors
Babaeva D.B., Fajzrahmanov R.R., SHishkin M.M., Daloglanyan A.A., ZHaboev A.A.
Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Moscow
Abstract
Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) remains a leading cause of acute visual loss and requires timely surgical repair. Contemporary epidemiology shows rising RRD incidence worldwide among highly myopic patients [1–4]. First-line surgical management for RRD with superior breaks is debated. Pneumatic retinopexy (PR) offers minimally invasive repair with favorable functional outcomes in well-selected cases; the PIVOT randomized trial demonstrated better visual acuity and less vertical metamorphopsia versus pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), albeit with higher rates of new postoperative breaks and strong dependence on patient compliance with head positioning [6–8; 17–19]. Scleral buckling (SB) remains relevant, especially in phakic eyes due to lower cataract progression risk, while PPV is now the most commonly performed procedure, driven by improved visualization, control of proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR), and advances in technology (small-gauge systems, 3D heads-up viewing, intraoperative OCT) [5; 9–11; 20–22]. Choice of tamponade (air, SF6/C2F6/C3F8 gas, silicone oil) should account for break location, PVR grade, and patient positioning; air tamponade is increasingly discussed for uncomplicated superior breaks, whereas long-acting gas or silicone oil remains preferable for giant retinal tears and advanced PVR [13–16; 23–25]. This review synthesizes selection criteria and proposes a pragmatic decision algorithm considering lens status, number and extent of breaks, PVR severity, macular status, and positioning adherence.
Keywords: rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, superior breaks, vitrectomy, scleral buckling, pneumatic retinopexy, proliferative vitreoretinopathy.
References
1. Fayzrakhmanov R.R., Klev V.S., Shishkin M.M., Pavlovsky O.A., Sekhina O.L., and Vaganova E.E. Retinal detachment with macular involvement: a struggle for maximum visual acuity.
2. Shishkin M.M., Kocheva E.A., Fayzrakhmanov R.R., and Sukhanova A.V. Episcleral Circular Sealing in Surgery of Recurrent Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment in Avitreal Eyes. 2022;138(6):65 69.
3. Fayzrakhmanov R.R., Shishkin M.M., Larina E.A., Vaganova E.E., Sekhina O.L. Surgical Treatment of Retinal Detachment Complicated by Macular Tear. Russian Ophthalmological Journal. 2023;16(4):159-164.
4. Babaeva D.B., Fayzrakhmanov R.R., Larina E.A., Daloglanyan A.A., Kamysheva K.V. (2025). Surgical Treatment of Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment with Upper Tears: A Modern Approach to the Problem.
5. Babaeva D.B., Fayzrakhmanov R.R., Daloglanyan A.A. A modern view on the classification and etiopathogenesis of proliferative vitreoretinopathy: a literature review. 2025;12(3): 56–61. https://doi.org/10.25276/2410-1257-2025-3-56-61.
6. Fayzrakhmanov R.R., Shishkin M.M., Vaganova E.E., Larina E.A., Babaeva D.B. Surgical Treatment of Patients with Macular Torn and Retinal Detachment. 2024.
7. Vaziri, K., Schwartz, G. S., Kishor, K. S., & Flynn, H. W., Jr. (2016). Tamponade in the surgical management of retinal detachment. Clinical Ophthalmology, 10, 471–476. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S96072.
8. Stewart, S., & Chan, W. (2018). Pneumatic retinopexy: Patient selection and specific factors. Clinical Ophthalmology, 12, 493–502. https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S137607.
9. Ehlers, J. P., Modi, Y. S., Pecen, P. E., et al. (2018). The DISCOVER Study 3-year results: Feasibility and usefulness of microscope-integrated intraoperative OCT during ophthalmic surgery. Ophthalmology, 125(7), 1014–1027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.12.026.
10. Romano, M. R., Cennamo, G, Comune, C., et al. (2018). Evaluation of 3D heads-up vitrectomy: Outcomes of psychometric skills testing and surgeon satisfaction. Eye, 32(6), 1093–1098. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0027-1.
11. Sverdlichenko, I., Lim, M., Popovic, M. M., et al. (2023). Postoperative positioning regimens in adults who undergo retinal detachment repair: A systematic review. Survey of Ophthalmology, 68(1), 113–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.survophthal.2022.09.002.
12. Juncal, V. R., Sheikh, A., Or, C., et al. (2021). Pneumatic retinopexy in patients fulfilling PIVOT criteria: Durability of anatomic reattachment and visual outcomes. Ophthalmology Retina, 5(9), 850–858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2021.03.006.
13. Zhou, C., Qiu, Q., & Zheng, Z. (2015). Air versus gas tamponade in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with inferior breaks after 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy: A prospective, randomized comparative interventional study. Retina, 35(5), 886–891. https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000000416.
14. Nishi, K., Ito, Y., Ideta, R., et al. (2023). Efficacy of vitrectomy with air tamponade for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Scientific Reports, 13, 10119. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-37228-3.
15. Shettigar, M. P., Shroff, C. M., Kulkarni, S., et al. (2024). Vitreous substitutes and tamponades: A review of types, indications and complications. Indian Journal of Ophthalmology, 72(8), 1345–1357. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijo.IJO_2261_23.
16. Seider, M. I., Hahn, P., Mruthyunjaya, P., Mahmoud, T. H., & Cox, J. T. (2013). Cost comparison of scleral buckle versus vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair in phakic and pseudophakic eyes. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 156(4), 705–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2013.04.009.
17. Dimakopoulou, I., Panagiotoglou, T. D., Bechrakis, N. E., et al. (2024). Vitrectomy versus scleral buckle for retinal detachment without posterior vitreous detachment. Scientific Reports, 14, 15206. https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41598-024-67318-w.
18. Abraham, J. R., Srivastava, S. K., & Ehlers, J. P. (2019). Intraoperative OCT features and postoperative ellipsoid zone integrity after macular surgery. Ophthalmology Retina, 3(4), 316–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2018.10.014.
19. Nielsen, B. R., Alberti, M., & Jørgensen, T. M. (2020). Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: Regional variation in incidence in Denmark. Acta Ophthalmologica, 98(6), 558–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.14411.
20. Mitry, D., Charteris, D. G., Yorston, D., et al. (2010). The epidemiology and socioeconomic associations of retinal detachment in Scotland: A two-year prospective population-based study. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 51(10), 4963–4968. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.10-5400.
21. American Academy of Ophthalmology Retina/Vitreous Panel. (2014). Preferred Practice Pattern®: Posterior vitreous detachment, retinal breaks, and lattice degeneration. American Academy of Ophthalmology. https://www.aao.org/ppp.
22. Schöneberger, V., Ahlers-Decor, R., Maier, M., et al. (2024). Short-acting versus long-acting gas tamponades in vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: Outcomes and rehabilitation. International Journal of Retina and Vitreous, 10, 27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40942-024-00530-y.
23. Heimann, H., Bartz-Schmidt, K.-U., Bornfeld, N., et al.; SPR Study Group. (2007). Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: A prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology, 114(12), 2142–2154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha. 2007.09.013.
24. Silicone Study Group. (1992). Vitrectomy with silicone oil or sulfur hexafluoride gas in eyes with severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy: Results of a randomized clinical trial (Silicone Study Report 1). Archives of Ophthalmology, 110(6), 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1992.01080180042027.
25. Silicone Study Group. (1992). Vitrectomy with silicone oil or perfluoropropane gas in severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy (Silicone Study Report 2). Archives of Ophthalmology, 110(6), 780–792. https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1992.01080180052028.
