DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2023_18_2_85

Authors

Varfolomeev D.I.

Chief military clinical hospital named after academic N.N. Burdenko, Moscow

Abstract

Periprosthetic infection is one of the most severe complications of hip arthroplasty.

Goal. To evaluate the possibility of treating peri-implant infection using the original spacers of the hip joint in the experiment.

Material and methods. Hip spacers with antibiotic containers inside them have been developed. The release of drugs into the periimplant space from spacers is carried out by the surgeon non-invasively through radio communication. An experimental study in 2 comparison groups in rabbits (10 animals in each group) was conducted. Peri-implant infection was simulated in the study. The original spacer was used in the main group, a standard bone cement spacer was used in the control group. Clinical, physiological, and laboratory parameters of animals were evaluated in the experiment, and histological studies were also performed.

Results. Wound healing in the main group was better than in the control group. The number of suppurations after the spacer installation in the main group was in 2 rabbits, in the control group — in 7 animals. Clinical, physiological and laboratory parameters did not differ significantly in the comparison groups. Histological studies of the tissues surrounding the spacers also demonstrated a lower degree of inflammation in the main group compared to the control group.

Conclusions. Developed hip spacers provide treatment for peri-implant infection without the use of systemic antibiotic therapy (in an experiment). Their use can avoid or reduce the number of side effects of antibacterial drugs.

Keywords: peri-implant infection, spacer, total hip arthroplasty.

References

1. Nikolenko VK, Buryachenko BP, Davydov DV, et al. Endoprosthetics for wounds, injuries and diseases of the hip joint: A guide for physicians. M.: Medicina, 2009: 134-135. (In Russ.)

2. Murylev VYu, Kukovenko GA, Elizarov PM, et al. The first-Stage Treatment аlgorithm for deep Infected Total Hip arthroplasty. Travmatologiya i ortopediya Rossii. 2018; 24(4): 95-104. (In Russ.)

3. Mederake M, Hofmann UK, Fink B. New Technique for Custom-Made Spacers in Septic Two-Stage Revision of Total Hip Arthroplasties. Antibiotics, 2021; 10:1073. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10091073.

4. Yang FS, Lu YD, Wu CT, et al. Mechanical failure of articulating polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) spacers in two-stage revision hip arthroplasty: the risk factors and the impact on interim function. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2019; 20: 372.

5. Jones CW, Selemon N, Nocon A, et al. The influence of spacer design on the rate of complications in two-stage revision hip arthroplasty. The Journal of Arthroplasty. 2019; 34: 1201-1206.

6. Li C, Renz N, Trampuz A, et al. Twenty common errors in the diagnosis and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection. International Orthopaedics. 2020; 44: 3-14.

7. Gorbatov RO, Blagonravova A S, Mitrofanov V N. et al. Individual hybrid implants for revision hip replacement in patients with periprosthetic infection. Sovremennye metody diagnostiki i lecheniya. 2021; 2(67): 50-57. (In Russ.)

8. Outcomes of two-stage revision arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with periprosthetic hip infection (retrospective cohort study). Genij Ortopedii. 2022; 28(2): 173-178. (In Russ.)

9. Linnik SA, Afinogenov GE, Afinogenova AG, et al. The choice of a spacer at the first stage of treatment for late deep periprosthetic hip joint infection. Genij Ortopedii. 2021; 27(5): 548-554. (In Russ.)

10. Klinder A, Zaatreh S, Ellenrieder M, et al. Antibiotics release from cement spacers used for two-stage treatment of implant-associated infections after total joint arthroplasty. J Biomed Mater Res Part B. 2019; 107B: 1587-1597.

11. Belt H, Neut D, Schenk W, et al. Gentamicin release from polymethylmethacrylate bone cements and Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation. Acta Orthop Scand. 2000; 71(6): 625-629.

12. Ravva A, Bruzzone M, Cottino U, et al. Hip spacers in two-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection: a review of literature. Joints. 2019; (2): 56-63.

13. Patent RUS №2017127378. Byul. №4. Akhtyamov I.F. Total hip spacer. (In Russ.)

14. Patent RUS №2011117694/14. Byul. №32. Reznik LB. Articulating hip spacer with methadiaphyseal fixation. (In Russ.)

15. Legonkova OA, Ogannisyan AS, Stafford VV, et al. Experimental study of possibility of using polymer gel as local depot for antimicrobial drugs. Polytrauma, 2022; 3: 67-73. (In Russ.)

For citation

Varfolomeev D.I. New spacers for the treatment of peri-implant infection. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2023;18(2):85-89. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2023_18_2_85