DOI: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2020.14.66.010

Authors

Bolotnikov M.A.1, Brizhan L.K.1, 2, Dzhodzhua A.V.1, Karpovich N.I.3

1 Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Moscow

2 Main Military Clinical Hospital named after N.N.Burdenko, Moscow

3 RUDN University, Moscow

Abstract

Background: One of the most serious complications of total knee arthroplasty is contracture associated with the formation of coarse fibrous connective tissue in the joint cavity (arthrofibrosis). This complication occurs in 1,3–5,7% of cases and requires surgical treatment.

Aims: Improving the quality of care for patients with contractures after arthroplasty of the knee joint by improving the technique of arthroscopic arthrolysis.

Materials and methods: The work is a single-center, prospective, selective, non-controlled study. The object of the study was 57 patients with contractures of the knee joint after arthoplasty for idiopathic gonarthrosis of the III stage. There were 50 female (87,7%), 7 male (12,3%), and the average age of the patients was 63,8±12,2. For contracture after arthroplasty of the knee, arthroscopic arthrolysis was performed. The study was conducted from 2015 to 2019. The effectiveness of the treatment was evaluated by the change in the range of movements and functional indicators determined on the KSS scale before and after 2 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Results: The KSS scale on the indicator “total assessment of the knee joint” have significant differences at p<0,05 between periods: before surgery and after 0,5 months, 0,5 and 3 months, 3 and 6 months after surgery. Functional assessment of the knee joint has significant differences at p<0,05 between all periods presented, which indicates a slower recovery dynamics of this indicator. The range of movements has significant differences at p<0,5 between periods: before surgery and after 0,5 months, 0,5 and 3 months after surgery. This suggests that the range of movements achieved during the first 3 months after arthrolysis can be considered the final achievement. Complications of contracture developed in 5 (8,8%) patients. Four arthrolysis was performed in 4 (7,0%) patients. Revision arthroplasty with replacement of all components of the arthroplasty was performed in 3 cases (5,3%). Thus, within 12 months after the operation, there is a complete restoration of the functioning indicators of the knee joint, while the final restoration of the range of motion can be judged after 3 months. KSS scores recover more slowly — within 6–12 months after arthroscopic arthrolysis.

Conclusions: Thus, within 12 months after the operation, there is a complete restoration of the functioning indicators of the knee joint, while the final restoration of the range of motion can be judged after 3 months. KSS scores recover more slowly — within 6–12 months after arthroscopic arthrolysis.

Keywords: total knee arthroplasty, arthrofibrosis, knee joint contracture, arthroscopic arthrolysis.

References

1. Abdul N, Dixon D, Walker A, et al. Fibrosis is a common outcome following total knee arthroplasty. Sci Rep. 2015;5:16469. Doi: 10.1038/srep16469.

2. Gandhi R, de Beer J, Leone J, et al. Predictive risk factors for stiff knees in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2006;21(1):46–52. Doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.06.004.

3. Kim J, Nelson CH, Lotke PA. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty. Prevalence of complication and outcome of revision. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86(7):1479–1484. Doi: 10.2106/00004623-200407000-00017.

4. Yercan HS, Sugun TS, Bussiere C, et al. Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: prevalence, management and outcomes. Knee. 2006;13(2):111–117. Doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2005.10.001.

5. Voznitskaya OE, Sabir'yanov AR, Atmanskii IA. Vosstanovitel'noe lechenie pri endoprotezirovanii kolennogo sustava. Uchebnoe posobie. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinskaya gosudarstvennaya meditsinskaya akademiya; 2009. 82 p. (In Russ).

6. Cheuy VA, Foran JRH, Paxton RJ, et al. Arthrofibrosis associated with total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017;32(8):2604–2611. Doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.005.

7. Haklar U, Ayhan E, Ulku TK, et al. Arthrofibrosis of the knee. In: Sports injuries. Berlin: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2015. p. 915–931.

8. Shang P, Liu HX, Zhang Y, et al. A mini-invasive technique for severe arthrofibrosis of the knee: a technical note. Injury. 2016;47(8):1867–1870. Doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2016.06.015.

9. Babis GC, Trousdale RT, Pagnano M, Morrey BF. Poor outcomes of isolated tibial insert exchange and arthrolysis for the management of stiffness following total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001;83(10):1534–1536. Doi: 10.2106/00004623-200110000-00012.

10. Hutchinson JR, Parish EN, Cross MJ. Results of open arthrolysis for the treatment of stiffness after total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87(10):1357–1360. Doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B10.16228.

11. Jerosch J, Aldawoudy AM. Arthroscopic treatment of patients with moderate arthrofibrosis after total knee replacement. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007;15(1):71–77. Doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0099-5.

12. Ortopediya: natsional'noe rukovodstvo. Ed by S.P. Mironov, G.P. Kotel'nikov. 2nd ed., revised and updated. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2013. (In Russ).

13. Enad JG. Arthroscopic lysis of adhesions for the stiff total knee arthroplasty. Arthrosc Tech. 2014;3(5):611–614. Doi: 10.1016/j.eats.2014.07.001.

14. Fitzsimmons SE, Vazquez EA, Bronson MJ. How to treat the stiff total knee arthroplasty?: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(4):1096–1106. Doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1230-y.

For citation

Bolotnikov M.A., Brizhan L.K., Dzhodzhua A.V., Karpovich N.I. Arthroscopic arthrolysis in treatment of contractures after knee joint arthoplasty. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2020;15(1):53-57. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/BPNMSC.2020.14.66.010