DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2023_19_1_28

Authors

Gulov M.K., Ruziboyzoda K.R., Nosirov E.Sh., Alizadeh S.G., Nosiri K.N., Safarov B.I.

Avicenna Tajik State Medical University, Dushanbe, Republic of Tajikistan

Abstract

Aim. Improving the effectiveness of complex treatment of patients with acute pancreatitis by introducing a personalized approach.

Material and methods. The study analyzed the outcomes of surgical intervention in 126 patients with various clinical forms of acute pancreatitis. The subjects were divided into two groups: the first, prospective group, which included 62 patients, and the second, retrospective group, which included 64 patients. In most cases (70.6%, or 89 patients), acute pancreatitis was of biliary origin (due to cholelithiasis), in 22.2% (28 patients) of cases, this pathology was of alcoholic origin, and in 7.2% (9 patients) cases — post-traumatic.

Results. Complex conservative treatment was carried out in 28 (22.2%) cases, among them in 17 patients from the main group and 11 patients from the control group with acute pancreatitis of alcoholic and post-traumatic origin. Minimally invasive interventions of varying volume and nature (percutaneous-drainage, endoscopic and laparoscopic), both one-stage and two-stage combined interventions in the main group were used in 38 (30.2%) patients. Traditional open surgical interventions in general were performed in 60 (47.6%) patients, of which in 7 (11.3%) cases according to strict indications in patients of the main group, and in patients of the control group — in 53 (82.8%) observations. In 20 (12%) observations, the development of early complications was noted after both complex drug treatment and after various surgical interventions in patients from the main group. Death occurred in 4 (6.4%) cases. In the control group of patients, 44 (68.7%) patients developed early complications of various types. Death in the control group occurred in 9 (14.1%) cases.

Conclusion. Thus, the choice of tactics and method of treatment, conservative or surgical approach using modern minimally invasive technologies for acute pancreatitis, must be strictly personalized. This choice depends on the cause of the disease, its clinical form and stage of development, as well as the presence of complications.

Keywords: acute pancreatitis, pancreatic necrosis, personalized approach, conservative treatment, minimally invasive interventions, laparotomy.

References

1. Aliev SA, Aliev ES. Unresolved issues of surgical tactics in infected pancreatic necrosis. Surgery. Journal named after N.I. Pirogov. 2015; 8: 64-69. (In Russ.)

2. Aranda-Narváez J.M. Acute necrotizing pancreatitis: Surgical indications and technical procedures. Journal of Clinic Cases. 2020; 2(12): 840-845.

3. Kolotushkin IA, Balnykov SI, Shubin LB. Evaluation of the Role of Octreotide in the Treatment of Pancreonecrosis. Surgery. Journal named after N.I. Pirogov. 2015; 6: 21-25. (In Russ.)

4. Kurbonov KM, Ruziboyzoda KR, Ali-Zade SG. Diagnosis and treatment of pancreatogenic bleeding. News of Surgery. 2020; 28(6): 648-654. (In Russ.)

5. Bolokov MS, Gurmikov BN, Shashev YuZ, Khimishev YuZ. Optimal tactics for managing patients with acute destructive pancreatitis. Bulletin of surgical gastroenterology. 2018; 1: 32-33. (In Russ.)

6. Bakker OJ. Treatment options for acute pancreatitis. National Reviews of Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2017; 11(8): 462-469.

7. Kurbonov KM, Nazirboev KR, Pirnazarov JM. Diagnosis and tactics of treatment of acute parapancreatitis. Bulletin of Avicenna. 2016; 2: 18-23. (In Russ.)

8. Banks PA, Bollen TL, Dervenis C, et al. Acute Pancreatitis Classification Working Group. Classification of acute pancreatitis-2012: revision of the Atlanta classification and definitions by international consensus. Gut. 2013; 62(1): 102-111.

9. Darwin VV, Onishchenko SV, Krasnov EA, Kolmakov PN, Kostrubin AL, Vardanyan TS. Staged endoscopic sequesternecrectomy in the treatment of patients with severe acute pancreatitis in the phase of septic sequestration. Infections in surgery. 2018; 16(1-2): 42-43. (In Russ.)

10. Kokhanenko NYu, Kashintsev AA, Petrik SV, Lugovoy AL, Ivanov AL, Danilov SA, Kalyuzhny SA. Minimally invasive interventions in the treatment of acute pancreatitis. Children’s Medicine of the North-West. 2018; 7(1): 170-171. (In Russ.)

11. Kurbonov KM, Nazirboev KR. Percutaneous puncture-drainage interventions under ultrasound control for fluid accumulations in acute pancreatitis. Bulletin of Surgery named after I.I. Grekov. 2019; 178(4): 26-28. (In Russ.)

12. Bagnenko SF, Goltsov VR, Savello VE, Vashetko RV. Classification of acute pancreatitis: the current state of the problem. Bulletin of Surgery named after I.I. Grekov. 2015; 174(5): 86-92. (In Russ.)

For citation

Gulov M.K., Ruziboyzoda K.R., Nosirov E.Sh., Alizadeh S.G., Nosiri K.N., Safarov B.I. Personalized approach to surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2024;19(1):28-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2023_19_1_28