DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2023_18_2_121

Authors

Kovalenko А.А.1, Karmazanovsky G.G.1, 2, Kondratyev E.V.1

1 A.V. Vishnevsky National Medical Research Center of Surgery, Moscow

2 N.I. Pirogov Russian National Research Medical, Moscow

Abstract

Rationale: Gallbladder disorders take one of the leading places in the structure of the pathology of the digestive system. The rapid development of computed tomography and magnetic resonance gave rise to include this modalities to the standards of medical care for adults with gallbladder diseases. It should be noted, however, that despite differences in etiopathogenesis there are similar and non-specific radiologic features for both non-neoplastic and neoplastic gallbladder lesions. Consequently, knowledge of the principal and specific radiologic evidences particulary relevant in today`s.

Aim: To analyze the differential diagnoses of benign and malignant lesions in the gallbladder, such as gallbladder cancer, adenomyomatosis, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, lymphoma, polyps and metastatic gallbladder lesions. To determine CT and MR features for each type of pathology, recognize diagnostic values and limitations of different diagnostic modalities.

Methods: A study of international literature in PubMed and Google Scholar databases from the 2003–2021 period was performed. We used the following search terms: gallbladder, gallbladder lesions, gallbladder сancer, gallbladder polyps, сholecystitis, хanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, adenomyomatosis.

Results: We have been recognized the main CT and MR features for neoplastic and non-neoplastic disorders of the gallbladder. We have also provided diagnostic values of this modalities.

Conclusion: Knowledge of specific radiologic findings in different gallbladder lesions, advantages and limitations of different modalities should always take into consideration, since it helps to identify the cause of changes with high accuracy. Accurate diagnosis is needed, determine varying tactics for managing patients with tumor and tumor-like lesions of the gallbladder.

Keywords: gallbladder, gallbladder cancer, cholecystitis, xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis, adenomyomatosis, gallbladder polyps.

References

1. Global Cancer Observatory. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; [cited 2022 Oct 21]. [URL]

2. Schmidt MA, Marcano-Bonilla L, Roberts LR. Gallbladder cancer: epidemiology and genetic risk associations. Chin Clin Oncol. 2019; 8(4): 31. doi: 10.21037/cco.2019.08.13.

3. Ouyang G., Liu Q, Wu Y, Liu Z , Lu W, Li S, Pan G, Chen X. The global, regional, and national burden of gallbladder and biliary tract cancer and its attributable risk factors in 195 countries and territories, 1990 to 2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Cancer. 2021; 127(13): 2238-2250. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33476.

4. Rustagi T, Dasanu CA. Risk factors for gallbladder cancer and cholangiocarcinoma: similarities, differences and updates. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2012; 43(2):137-47. doi: 10.1007/s12029-011-9284-y.

5. Ono A, Arizono S, Isoda H,Togashi K. Imaging of Pancreaticobiliary Maljunction. Radiographics. 2020; 40(2): 378-392. doi: 10.1148/rg.2020190108.

6. Morine Y, Shimada M, Takamatsu H, Araida T, Endo I, Kubota M,Toki A, Noda T, Matsumura T, Miyakawa S, Ishibashi H, Kamisawa T, Shimada H. Clinical features of pancreaticobiliary maljunction: update analysis of 2nd Japan-nationwide survey. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013; 20(5): 472-80. doi: 10.1007/s00534-013-0606-2.

7. Reid KM, Ramos-De la Medina A, Donohue JH. Diagnosis and surgical management of gallbladder cancer: a review. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007; 11(5): 671-81. doi: 10.1007/s11605-006-0075-x.

8. Song HW, Chen C, Shen HX, Ma L, Zhao YL, Zhang GJ, Geng ZM, Wang L. Squamous/adenosquamous carcinoma of the gallbladder: Analysis of 34 cases and comparison of clinicopathologic features and surgical outcomes with adenocarcinoma. J Surg Oncol. 2015; 112(6): 677-80. doi: 10.1002/jso.24065.

9. Tan СH, Lim KS. MRI of gallbladder cancer. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013; 19(4): 312-9. doi: 10.5152/dir.2013.044.

10. Revzin MV, Scoutt L, Smitaman E, Israel GM. The gallbladder: uncommon gallbladder conditions and unusual presentations of the common gallbladder pathological processes. Abdom Imaging. 2015; 40(2): 385-99. doi: 10.1007/s00261-014-0203-0.

11. Yun EJ, Cho SG, Park S, Park SW, Kim WH, Kim HJ, Suh CH. Gallbladder carcinoma and chronic cholecystitis: differentiation with two-phase spiral CT. Abdom Imaging. 2004; 29(1): 102-8. doi: 10.1007/s00261-003-0080-4.

12. Kim SJ, Lee JM, Lee JY, Kim SH, Han JK, Choi BI, Choi JY. Analysis of enhancement pattern of flat gallbladder wall thickening on MDCT to differentiate gallbladder cancer from cholecystitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191(3): 765-71. doi: 10.2214/AJR.07.3331.

13. Hwang J, Kim YK, Choi D, Rhim H, Lee WJ, Hong SS, Kim HJ, Chang YW. Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for T-staging of gallbladder carcinoma: emphasis on liver invasion. Br J Radiol. 2014; 87(1033): 20130608. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20130608.

14. Ogawa T, Horaguchi J, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Ito K, Koshita S, Kanno Y, Masu K, Sugita R. High b-value diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for gallbladder lesions: differentiation between benignity and malignancy. J Gastroenterol. 2012; 47(12): 1352-60. doi: 10.1007/ s00535-012-0604-1.

15. Lee NK, Kim S, Kim TU, Kim DU, Seo HI, Jeon TY. Diffusion-weighted MRI for differentiation of benign from malignant lesions in the gallbladder. Clin Radiol. 2014; 69(2): e78-85. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.09.017.

16. Lee NK, Kim S, Kim GH, Kim DU, Seo HI, Kim TU, Kang DH, Jang HJ. Diffusion-weighted imaging of biliopancreatic disorders: correlation with conventional magnetic resonance imaging. World J Gastroenterol. 2012; 18(31): 4102-17. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i31.4102.

17. Annunziata S, Pizzuto DA, Caldarella C, Galiandro F, Sadeghi R, Treglia G. Diagnostic accuracy of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in gallbladder cancer: A meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015; 21(40): 11481-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i40.11481.

18. Gupta V, Vishnu KS, Yadav TD, Sakaray YR, Irrinki S, Mittal BR, Kalra N, Vaiphei K. Radio-pathological Correlation of 18F-FDG PET in Characterizing Gallbladder Wall Thickening. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2019; 50(4): 901-906. doi: 10.1007/s12029-018-0176-2.

19. Ramos-Font C, Gómez Río M, Rodríguez-Fernández A, Jiménez-Heffernan А, Sánchez Sánchez R, Llamas Elvira JM. Ability of FDG-PET/CT in the detection of gallbladder cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2014; 109(3): 218-24. doi: 10.1002/jso.23476.

20. Golse N, Lewin M, Rode A, Sebagh M, Mabrut JY. Gallbladder adenomyomatosis: diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg. 2017; 154(5): 345-353. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2017.06.004.

21. Bonatti M, Vezzali N, Lombardo F, Ferro F, Zamboni G, Tauber M, Bonatti G. Gallbladder adenomyomatosis: imaging findings, tricks and pitfalls. Insights Imaging. 2017; 8(2): 243-253. doi: 10.1007/s13244-017-0544-7.

22. Nishimura A, Shirai Y, Hatakeyama K. Segmental adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder predisposes to cholecystolithiasis. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2004; 11(5): 342-7. doi: 10.1007/s00534-004-0911-x.

23. Haradome H, Ichikawa T, Sou H, Yoshikawa T, Nakamura A, Araki T, Hachiya J. The Pearl Necklace Sign: An Imaging Sign of Adenomyomatosis of the Gallbladder at MR Cholangiopancreatography. Radiology. 2003; 227(1): 80-8. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2271011378.

24. Yoshimitsu K, Honda H, Aibe H, Shinozaki K, Kuroiwa T, Irie H, Asayama Y, Masuda K. Radiologic diagnosis of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder: comparative study among MRI, helical CT, and transabdominal US. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001; 5(6): 843-50. doi: 10.1097/00004728-200111000-00003.

25. Joo I, Lee JY, Kim JH, Kim SJ, Kim MA, Han JK, Choi BI. Differentiation of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder from early-stage, wall-thickening-type gallbladder cancer using high-resolution ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2013; 23(3): 730-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-012-2641.

26. Bang SH, Lee JY, Woo H, Joo I, Lee ES, Han JK, Choi BI. Differentiating between adenomyomatosis and gallbladder cancer: revisiting a comparative study of high-resolution ultrasound, multidetector CT, and MR imaging. Korean J Radiol. 2014; 15(2): 226-34. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.226.

27. Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, Aibe H, Tajima T, Nishie A, Asayama Y, Matake K, Yamaguchi K, Matsuura S, Honda H. Well-differentiated adenocarcinoma of the gallbladder with intratumoral cystic components due to abundant mucin production: a mimicker of adenomyomatosis. Eur Radiol. 2005; 15(2): 229-33. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2516-9.

28. Giudicelli X, Rode A, Bancel B, Nguyen AT, Mabrut JY. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: Diagnosis and management. J Visc Surg. 2021; 158(4): 326-336. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.02.004.

29. Singh VP, Rajesh S, Bihari C, Desai SN, Pargewar SS, Arora A. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: What every radiologist should know. World J Radiol. 2016; 8(2): 183-91. doi: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i2.183.

30. Hale MD, Roberts KJ, Hodson J, Scott N, Sheridan M, Toogood GJ. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: a European and global perspective HPB (Oxford). 2014; 16(5): 448-58. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12152.

31. Shuto R, Kiyosue H, Komatsu E, Matsumoto S, Kawano K, Kondo Y, Yokoyama S, Mori H. CT and MR imaging findings of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: correlation with pathologic findings. Eur Radiol. 2004; 14(3): 440-6. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1931-7.

32. Zhao F, Lu PX, Yan SX, Wang GF, Yuan J, Zhang SZ, Wáng YX. CT and MR features of xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: an analysis of consecutive 49 cases. Eur J Radiol. 2013; 82(9): 1391-7. doi: 10.1016/ j.ejrad.2013.04.026.

33. Kang TW, Kim SH, Park HJ, Lim S, Jang KM, Choi D, Lee SJ. Differentiating xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis from wall-thickening type of gallbladder cancer: Added value of diffusion-weighted MRI. Clin Radiol. 2013; 68(10): 992-1001. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2013.03.022.

34. Goshima S, Chang S, Wang JH, Kanematsu M, Bae KT, Federle MP. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis: diagnostic performance of CT to differentiate from gallbladder cancer. Eur J Radiol. 2010; 74(3): e79-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.04.017.

35. Sureka B, Singh VP, Rajesh SR, Laroia S, Bansal K, Rastogi A, Bihari C, Bhadoria AS, Agrawal N, Arora A. Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance (MR) Findings in Xanthogranulomatous Cholecystitis: Retrospective Analysis of Pathologically Proven 30 Cases — Tertiary Care Experience. Pol J Radiol. 2017; 82: 327-332. doi: 10.12659/PJR.901728.

36. Honda M, Furuta Y, Naoe H, Sasaki Y. Primary mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma of the gallbladder and review of the literature. BMJ Case Rep. 2017; 2017:bcr2017220161. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-220161.

37. Ono А, Tanoue S, Yamada Y, Takaji Y, Okada F, Matsumoto S, Mori H. Primary malignant lymphoma of the gallbladder: a case report and literature review. Br J Radiol. 2009; 82(973): e15-9. doi: 10.1259/bjr/30768802.

38. An HJ, Lee W, Jeong CY. Primary Follicular Lymphoma of Gallbladder Presenting as Multiple Polyps Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020; 18(1): e5-e6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.012.

39. Wiles R, Thoeni RF, Barbu ST, Vashist YK, Rafaelsen SR, Dewhurst C, Arvanitakis M, Lahaye M, Soltes M, Perinel J, Roberts SA. Management and follow-up of gallbladder polyps. Joint guidelines between the European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR), European Association for Endoscopic Surgery and other Interventional Techniques (EAES), International Society of Digestive Surgery – European Federation (EFISDS) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). Eur Radiol. 2017; 27(9): 3856-3866. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-4742-y.

40. Martin E, Gill R, Debru E. Diagnostic accuracy of transabdominal USG for gallbladder polyps:systematic review. Can J Surg. 2018; 61(3): 200-207. doi: 10.1503/cjs.011617.

41. Kim KH. Gallbladder polyps: evolving approach to the diagnosis and management. Yeungnam Univ J Med. 2021; 38(1): 1-9. doi: 10.12701/yujm. 2020.00213.

42. Tseng JH, Wan YL, Hung CF, Ng KK, Pan KT, Chou AS, Liu NJ. Diagnosis and staging of gallbladder carcinoma Evaluation with dynamic MR imaging. Clin Imaging. 2002; 26(3): 177-82. doi: 10.1016/s0899-7071(01)00409-0.

43. Bitter TJJ, Trapman DM, Simmer F, Hugen N, Savornin Lohman EAJ, Reuver PR, Verheij J, Nagtegaal ID, Post RS. Metastasis in the gallbladder: does literature reflect reality? Virchows Arch. 2022; 480(6): 1201-1209. doi: 10.1007/s00428-022-03314-7.

44. Choi WS, Kim SH, Lee ES, Lee KB, Yoon WJ, Shin CI, Han JK. CT findings of gallbladder metastases: emphasis on differences according to primary tumors. Korean J Radiol. 2014; 15(3): 334-45. doi: 10.3348/kjr. 2014.15.3.334.

45. Seong M, Kang TW, Kim M, Kim SS, Jang KM, Kim YK, Kim SH. Tumefactive gallbladder sludge — the MRI findings. Clin Radiol. 2016; 71(4): 402.e9-402.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2016.01.004.

For citation

Kovalenko А.А., Karmazanovsky G.G., Kondratyev E.V. Radiologic diagnosis of tumors and tumor-like lesions of the gallbladder: an illustrated literature review. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2023;18(2):121-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2023_18_2_121