DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2023_18_1_101

Authors

Pokhabov D.S., Tankaeva Kh.S., Kuzmin N.S., Madzaev S.R., Zhiburt E.B., Shalygin L.D.

Pirogov National Medical and Surgical Center, Moscow

Abstract

Rationale: the education of pediatric transfusion doctors aims to create evidence-based clinical thinking that leads to better outcomes.

Objective: to assess the change in knowledge about the appointment of erythrocyte transfusion in children over 15 years.

Methods: using the original questionnaire on 4 clinical situations, we determined the knowledge of 110 doctors about the hemoglobin level at which erythrocytes should be transfused to children, as well as the volume of transfused erythrocytes. The results were compared with the answers of 134 colleagues 15 years ago. The results were evaluated by descriptive statistics at a significance level of p<0.05.

Results: in all 4 scenarios, there was a statistically significant reduction in the proportion of physicians who ordered blood transfusions at a higher hemoglobin concentration and at an increased dose of injected red blood cells.

In total, in all simulated situations, doctors in 2023 would prescribe a transfusion:

a) with a hemoglobin concentration above 90 g/l — in 10.7% of cases, and in 2008 — in 36.5% (p<0.001),

b) in the maximum suggested dose (20 ml/kg) l — in 5.4% of cases, and in 2008 — in 17.6% (p<0.001).

Despite the increase in adherence to the restrictive tactics of erythrocyte transfusion, the heterogeneity of the answers of the interviewed specialists attracts attention: the share of the most frequent answers about the threshold level of hemoglobin in different scenarios ranged from 29.8% to 75.5% (in 2008 — from 24.6 % to 57.3%.

Conclusion: based on the results of 2 surveys of doctors on the threshold level of hemoglobin for prescribing blood components and the dose of red blood cells transfused to children, performed in 2008 and 2023. it has been established that changes in knowledge about blood transfusion in children increase physicians’ adherence to restrictive tactics of erythrocyte transfusions. The heterogeneity of the answers of the interviewed specialists necessitates the improvement of educational activities in the field of clinical transfusiology.

Keywords: blood, blood transfusion, erythrocytes, knowledge, restrictive, liberal.

References

1. Shevchenko YL, Zhiburt EB, Shestakov EA. The implementation of a blood-saving ideology in the practice of the Pirogov Center. Vestnik Nacional’nogo mediko-hirurgicheskogo centra im. N.I.Pirogova. 2008; 3(1): 14-21. (In Russ.)

2. Shevchenko YL, Zhiburt EB, Shestakov EA. Implementation of the guidelines for the transfusion of blood components in clinical practice. Vestnik hirurgii imeni I.I. Grekova. 2008; (4): 85-89. (In Russ.)

3. Zhiburt EB, Khamitov RG, Shalygin LD. Inactivation of pathogens in pediatric transfusiology. Tromboz, gemostaz i reologiya. 2022; (2): 33–40. (In Russ.). doi: 10.25555/THR.2022.2.1017.

4. Zhiburt EB, Shestakov EA, Lihonin DA, Karavaev AV Women’s plasma transfusion damages recipient’s lungs. Vestnik Nacional’nogo mediko-hirurgicheskogo centra im. N.I.Pirogova. 2011; 6(2): 109-111. (In Russ.)

5. Chemodanov IG, Gorelikova LG, Ljackovskij AI et al. Transfusion Circulatory Overload Prevention Tool. Vestnik Nacional’nogo mediko-hirurgicheskogo centra im. N.I. Pirogova. 2018; 13(4): 93-95. (In Russ.)

6. Shevchenko Y.L., Karpov O.E., Zhiburt E.B. Blood transfusion: history and modernity (on the 100th anniversary of blood transfusion in Russia)). Vestnik Nacional’nogo mediko-hirurgicheskogo centra im. N.I. Pirogova. 2019; 14(4): 4-11. (In Russ.) doi: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2020.29.78.001.

7. Zhiburt E.B. Blood transfusion for children. M.: Nacional’nyj mediko-hirurgicheskij centr imeni N.I. Pirogova, 2018. (In Russ.)

8. Zhiburt E.B., Kodenev A.T., Gubanova M.N., Kopchenko T.G. To the point of knowledge in pediatric transfusiology. Vestnik intensivnoj terapii. 2009; 1: 38-40. (In Russ.)

9. Lacroix J. Hebert PC, Hutchinson JC, et al. Transfusion strategies for patients in pediatric intensive care units. New Eng. J. Med. 2007; 356(16): 1609-1619. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa066240.

10. Pohabov DS, Kuzmin NS, Madzaev SR, et al. Pediatric transfusiology and modern blood components in Russian regulatory documents. Spravochnik zavedujushhego KDL. 2022; 11: 47-58. (In Russ.)

11. Valentine SL, Bembea MM, Muszynski JA et al. Consensus Recommendations for RBC Transfusion Practice in Critically Ill Children From the Pediatric Critical Care Transfusion and Anemia Expertise Initiative. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2018; 19(9): 884-898. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000001613.

12. Nahum E, Ben-Ari J, Schonfeld T. Blood transfusion policy among European pediatric intensive care physicians. J. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 19(1): 38-43. doi: 10.1177/0885066603257966.

13. Zhiburt EB, Madzaev SR, Shestakov EA. Patient blood management. 2nd edition. M.: Nacional’nyj mediko- hirurgicheskij centr imeni N.I. Pirogova, 2021. (In Russ.)

14. Hamitov RG, Suhareva AS, Kutefa EI, Zhiburt EB. Is a one-time training in transfusiology sufficient? Transfuziologija. 2022; 23(3): 270-278. (In Russ.)

For citation

Pokhabov D.S., Tankaeva Kh.S., Kuzmin N.S., Madzaev S.R., Zhiburt E.B., Shalygin L.D. About the professional level of children's transfusiologists. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2023;18(1):101-104. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/20728255_2023_18_1_101