DOI: 10.25881/20728255_2021_16_3_57


Zakeryaev A.B.1, Vinogradov R.A.1, 2, Matusevich V.V.1, Butaev S.R.1, Suhoruchkin P.V.1, Baryshev A.G.1, 2, Porhanov V.A.1, 2

1 Ochapovsky Regional Clinical Hospital №1, Krasnodar

2 Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar


The review presents the history of the development of open methods for the surgical treatment of chronic lower limb arterial insufficiency. The main stages of the development of reconstructive surgery of the femoral-popliteal segment are highlighted. The safety and effectiveness of the techniques under consideration are compared.

Keywords: femoral-popliteal bypass grafting, critical lower limb ischemia, revascularization, atherosclerosis.


1. Pokrovsky AV, editor. Clinical Angiology: Manual. In 2 vols. Vol. 2. Moscow: Meditsina; 2004. 886 p. (In Russ).

2. Veith FJ, Haimovici H. Femoropopliteal arteriosclerotic occlusive disease: operative treatment. In: Ascher E, Hollier LH, Strandness DE, Towne JB, Haimovici H, et al. Haimovici’s Vascular Surgery. 5th ed. Blackwell Science; 2004: 534–558. doi: 10.1002/9780470755815.ch42.

3. Humphries AW, deWolfe VG, et al. Evaluation of the natural history and the results of treatment in occlusive arteriosclerosis involving the lower extremities. In: Wesolowski SA, Dennis C, editors. Fundamentals of Vascular Grafting. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1963: 423.

4. Fontaine R, Kieny R, et al. Long-term results of restorative arterial surgery in obstructive diseases of the arteries. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1964; 5: 463.

5. Gensler SW, Haimovici H, Hoffert P, Steinman Ch, Beneventano TC. Study of vascular lesions in diabetic, nondiabetic patients: clinical, arteriographic, and surgical considerations. Arch Surg. 1965; 91(4): 617. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1965.01320160071016.

6. Fowkes FGR, Rudan D, Rudan I, et al. Comparison of global estimates of prevalence and risk factors for peripheral artery disease in 2000 and 2010: a systematic review and analysis. The Lancet. 2013; 382: 1329–1340. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61249-0.

7. Ascher E, Hollier LH, Strandness DE, Towne JB, Haimovici H, et al., eds. Haimovici’s Vascular Surgery. 5th ed. Blackwell Science; 2004. 1221 p. doi: 10.1002/9780470755815.

8. Pokrovsky AV, Bogatov YuP. The History of Vascular Surgery in Russia. Pokrovsky AV, editor. Clinical Angiology: Manual. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Meditsina; 2004: 17-30. (In Russ).

9. Rothwell A. Alexis Carrel: Innovator Extraordinaire. J Perioper Pract. 2011; 21(2): 73–76. doi: 10.1177/175045891102100205.

10. Al’tmark EM. Hirurg Anna Ivanovna Morozova i ee vklad v razvitie rossijskoj hirurgii. Vestnik hirurgii im. I.I. Grekova. 2015; 174(5): 105-107. (In Russ).

11. Jeger E. Die Chirurgie der Blutgefässe und des Herzens. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1913: 262.

12. Kunlin J. Le traitement de l’artèrite oblitérante par la greffe veineuse. Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss. 1949; 42: 371.

13. Connolly JE. The history of the in situ saphenous vein bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2011; 53(1): 241-243. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.05.018.

14. Hall KV. The great saphenous vein used in situ as an arterial shunt after extirpation of the vein valves: a preliminary report. Surgery. 1962; 51: 492-495.

15. Voorhees ABJr, Jaretzki AI, Blakemore AH. The use of tubes constructed from Vinyon “N” cloth in bridging arterial defects: a preliminary report. Ann Surg. 1952; 135: 332-336.

16. Ivchenko AO, Shvedov AN, Ivchenko OA. Vascular prostheses used in infrainguinal arterial reconstruction. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2017; 16(1): 132-139. (In Russ). doi: 10.20538/1682-0363-2017-1-132-139.

17. Lebedev LV, Plotkin LL, Smirnov AD, Vavilov VN. Blood Vessel Prostheses. 4th ed. St. Petersburg: Admiralteystvo; 2001. 294 p. (In Russ).

18. Sriram BM. SRB’s Surgical Operations: Text and Atlas. 2nd ed. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers Ltd; 2017. 1438 p.

19. Connolly JE, Harris EJ, Mills W Jr. Autogenous in situ saphenous vein for bypass of femoral-popliteal obliterative disease. Surgery. 1964; 55(1): 144-153.

20. Cole JS, Wijesinghe LD, Watterson JK, Scott DJA. Computational and experimental simulations of the haemodynamics at cuffed arterial bypass graft anastomoses. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2002; 216(2): 135-143. doi: 10.1243/0954411021536351.

21. Leuprecht A, Perktold K, Prosi M, Berk T, Trubel W, Schima H. Numerical study of hemodynamics and wall mechanics in distal end-to-side anastomoses of bypass grafts. J Biomech. 2002; 35(2): 225-236. doi: 10.1016/s0021-9290 (01)00194-4.

22. Calligaro KD, Ascer E, Torres M, Veith FJ. The effect of adjunctive arteriovenous fistula on prosthetic graft patency: a controlled study in a canine model. J Cardiovasc Surg. 1990; 31: 646-650.

23. Miller JH, Foreman RK, Ferguson L, Faris A. Interposition vein cuff for anastomosis of prosthesis to small artery. Aust N Z J Surg. 1984; 54(3): 283-285. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1984.tb05318.x.

24. Tailor RS, Loh A, McFarland RJ, Cox M, Chester FG. Improved technique for polytetrafluoroethylene bypass grafting: long-term results using anastomotic vein patches. Br J Surg. 1992; 79(4): 348-354. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800790424.

25. Tyrell MR, Wolfe JHN. New prosthetic venous collar anastomotic technique: combining the best of other procedures. Br J Surg. 1991; 78(8): 1016-1017. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800780840.

26. Wolfe JN, Tyrell M. Venous patches, collars, and boots improve the patency rates of polytetrafluorethylene grafts. Adv Vasc Surg. 1995; 3: 134-143.

27. Pokrovskij AV, Jakhontov DI. Role of venous cuff in femoral-tibial bypass surgery. Vestnik Natsionalnogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo tsentra im. N.I. Pirogova. 2013; 8(4): 18-24. (In Russ).

28. Barsukov AE, Svetlyakov AV, Khardikov IE. Use of LeMaitre valvulotome for in situ vein bypass surgery in femoral-distal reconstructions. Ambulatornaya khirurgiya. 2005; 4: 27-28. (In Russ).

29. Pshenichny VN, Shtunin AA, Ivanenko AA, Voropaev VV, Kovalchuk ON, Gaevoi VL. Efficacy of two-level infrainguinal reconstructions in treatment of chronic critical lower limb ischaemia. Angiology and Vascular Surgery. 2012; 18(3): 132-137. (In Russ).

30. Rychlik IJ, Davey Ph, Murphy J, O’Donnell ME. A meta-analysis to compare Dacron versus polytetrafluroethylene grafts for above-knee femoropopliteal artery bypass. J Vasc Surg. 2014; 60(2): 506-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.05.049.

31. Sukovatykh BS, Belikov LN, Sukovatykh MB, Sidorov DV, Inokhodova EB. Femoropopliteal bypass by free autovenous graft below the knee-joint slot in the treatment of critical limb ischemia. Novosti khirurgii. 2015;23:637–643. (In Russ.)

32. Mirolubov BM, Kamaldtinov RR, Sayfutdinova AR. Comparative results fem-pop bypass and deep fem-pop bypass. International Research Journal. 2016; 44(2-3): 67-69. (In Russ). doi: 10.18454/IRJ.2016.44.126.

33. Krepkogorskiy NV, Bulatov DG. Results of in situ femoropopliteal (tibial) bypass in patients with extended lower limbs arterial bed lesion and critical ischemia. Kazan Medical Journal. 2015; 96: 942-949. (In Russ). doi: 10.17750/KMJ2015-942.

34. Matyushkin AV, Lobachev AA. Long-term results of different methods of surgical revascularisation of the femoral-popliteal occlusions. Vestnik Natsionalnogo mediko-khirurgicheskogo tsentra im. N.I. Pirogova. 2018; 13(2): 18-25. (In Russ).

35. Humbarger O, Siracuse JJ, Rybin D, et al. Broad variation in prosthetic conduit use for femoral-popliteal bypass is not justified on the basis of contemporary outcomes favoring autologous great saphenous vein. J Vasc Surg. 2019; 70(5): 1514-1523. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.02.046.

For citation

Zakeryaev A.B., Vinogradov R.A., Matusevich V.V., Butaev S.R., Suhoruchkin P.V., Baryshev A.G., Porhanov V.A. Femoral-popliteal bypass surgery: from its origins to the present day. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2021;16(3):57-60. (In Russ.)