DOI: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2021.47.56.009

Authors

Bokarev M.I.1, 2, Mamykin A.I.1, 2, Muntyanu E.V.1, Kryazhev D.L.2, Demyanov A.I.1, 2, Markarov A.E.2

1 I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow

2 City Clinical Hospital named after A.K. Eramishantsev, Moscow

Abstract

Background: Acute colonic obstruction often complicates the clinical course of colorectal cancer and is its first manifestation. Emergency surgery remains the basic method of treating patients with acute malignant colonic obstruction(AMCO), but the high mortality rate and high incidence of postoperative complications force doctors to look for other ways to treat these patients. Endoscopic colon stenting with self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) is a modern method of eliminating AMCO. The clinical possibilities of this technique are not fully understood.

Aims: to evaluate the results of treatment of patients AMCO with endoscopic stenting of the colon.

Materials and methods: A retrospective study of the results of endoscopic stenting of the large intestine of SMS in patients with AMCO, performed for the period 2016–2020, was carried out.

The study included 230 patients with AMCO who attempted to eliminate acute intestinal obstruction by endoscopic method using SEMS. The results of endoscopic stenting were evaluated based on the calculation of the technical and clinical effectiveness of the method, the frequency of postmanipulation complications and the mortality rate.

Results: The study found that the technical efficiency of endoscopic colon stenting is 91.7%, the clinical efficiency is 83.5%, the incidence of stenting complications is 8.3%, the incidence of somatic complications is 11.7%, and the mortality rate is 4.8%.

Conclusions: Endoscopic colon stenting using SEMS is an effective and fairly safe method.

Keywords: аcute colonic obstruction; colorectal cancer; colorectal stenting.

References

1. Bokarev MI, Vodoleev AS, Mamykin AI, et al. Effectiveness of various approaches for acute malignant colonic obsturtion. Surgery. Journal named N.I. Pirogov. 2018; 10: 55–60 (In Russ).

2. Arya N. Community experience of colonic stenting in patients with acute large bowel obstructions. Canadian Journal of Surgery. 2011; 54(4): 282–285. doi: 10.1503/cjs.015510.

3. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018; 68(6): 394–424. doi: 10.3322/ caac.21492.

4. Jullumstrø E, Wibe A, Lydersen S, Edna T. Colon cancer incidence, presentation, treatment and outcomes over 25 years. Colorectal Disease. 2011; 13(5): 512–518. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02191.x.

5. Cheynel N, Cortet M, Lepage C et al. Trends in Frequency and Management of Obstructing Colorectal Cancers in a Well-Defined Population. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2007; 50(10): 1568–1575. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-9007-4.

6. McArdle C, McMillan D, Hole D. The impact of blood loss, obstruction and perforation on survival in patients undergoing curative resection for colon cancer. British Journal of Surgery. 2006; 93(4): 483–488. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5269.

7. Biondo S, Parés D, Frago R et al. Large Bowel Obstruction: Predictive Factors for Postoperative Mortality. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2004; 47(11): 1889–1897. doi: 10.1007/s10350-004-0688-7.

8. Deen K, Madoff R, Goldberg S, Rothenberger D. Surgical management of left colon obstruction: the University of Minnesota experience. J Am Coll Surg. 1998; 187(6): 573–576. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(98)00253-1.

9. Nugent K, Daniels P, Stewart B, et al. Quality of life in stoma patients. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1999; 42(12): 1569–1574. doi: 10.1007/bf02236209.

10. Park J, Del Pino A, Orsay C, et al. Stoma complications. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 1999; 42(12): 1575–1580. doi: 10.1007/bf02236210.

11. Dohmoto M. New method; endoscopic implantation of rectal stent in palliative treatment of malignant stenosis. Endosc Digest. 1991; 3: 1507–1512.

12. Dauphine C, Tan P, Beart R, et al. Placement of self-expanding metal stents for acute malignant large-bowel obstruction: A collective review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002; 9(6): 574–579. doi: 10.1007/bf02573894.

13. Cirocchi R, Farinella E, Trastulli S, et al. Safety and efficacy of endoscopic colonic stenting as a bridge to surgery in the management of intestinal obstruction due to left colon and rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Oncol. 2013; 22(1): 14–21. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc. 2012.10.003.

14. Ptok H, Meyer F, Marusch F, et al. Palliative stent implantation in the treatment of malignant colorectal obstruction. Surg Endosc. 2006; 20(6): 909–914. doi: 10.1007/s00464-005-0594-7.

15. Pirlet I, Slim K, Kwiatkowski F, et al. Emergency preoperative stenting versus surgery for acute left-sided malignant colonic obstruction: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. Surg Endosc. 2010; 25(6): 1814–1821. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1471-6.

16. Nemes R, Vasile I, Curca T, et al. Acute bowel obstruction — the main complication of colorectal cancer. Therapeutical options. Rom J Gastroenterol 2004 Jun; 13(2): 109–12.

17 Eberlein T. Short-term Endpoints of Conventional Versus Laparoscopic-Assisted Surgery in Patients With Colorectal Cancer (MRC CLASICC Trial): Multicentre, Randomised Controlled Trial. Yearbook of Surgery. 2006; 2006: 339–342. doi:-10.1016/s0090-3671(08)70551-2.

18. Guo M, Feng Y, Liu J, et al. Factors associated with mortality risk for malignant colonic obstruction in elderly patients. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014; 14(1). doi: 10.1186/1471-230x-14-76.

19. Datye A, Hersh J. Colonic perforation after stent placement for malignant colorectal obstruction — causes and contributing factors. Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies. 2010; 20(3): 133–140. doi: 10.3109/ 13645706.2010.518787.

For citation

Bokarev M.I., Mamykin A.I., Muntyanu E.V., Kryazhev D.L., Demyanov A.I., Markarov A.E. The effectiveness of endoscopic colon stenting in patients with acute malignant colonic obstruction. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2021;16(1):52-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/BPNMSC.2021.47.56.009