DOI: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2019.13.27.010

Authors

Yakimovich A.I.1, Sizonenko N.А.1, Surov D.A.1, Soloviev I.А.1, Bezmozgin B.G.2, Babkov О.V.2, Sviatnenko A.V.1, 2

1 S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy, Saint Petersburg

2 Saint Petersburg I.I. Dzhanelidze research institute of emergency medicine, Saint Petersburg

Abstract

Background. At present, adequate relief of postoperative pain using regional analgesia methods is becoming a popular solution in the structure of providing surgical interventions. Multimodal analgesia, which involves the simultaneous use of two or more analgesics with a different route of administration, is gaining increasing popularity. It allows to achieve adequate analgesia with a minimum of side effects, and also, often, to refuse the use of opiates. This approach is actively used in performing planned interventions, but the situation in emergency surgery is diametrically opposite. The aim of this study was a comparative analysis of the results of the application of the principles of multimodal analgesia in the surgical treatment of patients with colorectal cancer complicated by an acute decompensated colonic obstruction.

Materials and methods. The study involved 105 patients with acute obstructive colonic obstruction of tumor origin, included in three groups (34, 36 and 35 people, respectively). Epidural anesthesia and continuous wound infusion were used to relieve pain in patients of the 1st group. In group 2 only epidural anesthesia was used. In group 3 a standard anesthetic pattern was used — non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and opioid drugs (on request).

Results. As criteria for a comparative assessment, we studied: the intensity of the pain syndrome, the need for NSAIDs and narcotic analgesics, the terms of verticalization of patients, the terms of restoration of the motor and evacuation function of the gastrointestinal tract (the appearance of noise of intestinal motility, gas and stool discharge, myoelectric activity).

Conclusion.The analysis of the obtained data convincingly demonstrated that a combination of analgesia methods is the most effective approach to solving the problem of pain relief in the postoperative period.

Keywords: colorectal cancer, acute obstructive colonic obstruction, multimodal analgesia, continuous wound infusion.

References

1. Correll DJ, Vlassakov KV, Kissin I. No evidence of real progress in treatment of acute pain, 1993-2012: scientometric analysis. J Pain Res. 2014; 7:199-210. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S60842.

2. Carr DB, Goudas LC. Acute pain. Lancet. 1999;353(9169):2051-2058. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)03313-9.

3. Ovechkin AM. Posleoperacionnaya bol’: sostoyanie problemy i sovremennye tendencii posleoperacionnogo obezbolivaniy. Regionarnaya anesteziya i lechenie ostroj boli. 2015;9(2):29-39 (In Russ).

4. Behm B, Stollman N. Postoperative ileus: etiologies and interventions. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1(2):71-80. doi: 10.1053/cgh.2003.50012.

5. Kitching AJ, O’Neill SS. Fast-track surgery and anaesthesia. Continuing Education in Anaesthesia Critical Care & Pain. 2009;9(2):39–43. doi: 10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkp006.

6. Rawal N. Epidural technique for post-operative pain: gold standard no more? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2012;37(3):310–317. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0b013e31825735c6.

7. Joshi G, Gandhi K, Shah N, et al. Peripheral nerve blocks in the management of postoperative pain; challenges and opportunities. J Clin Anesth. 2016;35:524-529. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2016.08.041.

8. Karthikesalingam A, Walsh SR, Markar SR, et al. Continuous wound infusion of local anaesthetic agents following colorectal surgery: Systematic review and metaanalysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(34):5301-5305. doi: 10.3748/wjg.14.5301.

9. Ansaloni L, Agnoletti V, Bettini D, et al. The analgesic efficacy of continuous elastomeric pump ropivacaine wound instillation after appendectomy. J Clin Anesth.2007;19(4): 256-263. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.12.005

10. Ovechkin AM. Hronicheskij posleoperacionnyj bolevoj sindrom – podvodnyj kamen’ sovremennoj hirurgii. Regionarnaya anesteziya i lechenie ostroj boli. 2016;10(1):5-18 (In Russ).

11. Popov AS, Ekstrem AV, Kazancev DA. Vnedrenie protokolov lecheniya posleoperacionnoj boli v Volgogradskoj oblasti. Vestnik VolgGMU. 2010;(1):67-69 (In Russ).

12. Gerbershagen HJ, Aduckathil S, van Wijck AJ, et al. Pain intensity on the first day after surgery: a prospective cohort study comparing 179 surgical procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013; 118(4):934–944. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31828866b3.

13. Merkel S., Meyer C, Papadopoulos T, et al. Urgent surgery in colon carcinoma. Zentralbl Chir. 2007;132(1):16-25. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-958708.

14. Nejmark MI, Kiselev RV. Mul’timodal’naya anal’geziya v bariatricheskoj hirurgii. Regionarnaya anesteziya i lechenie ostroj boli. 2016;10(4):254-261. (In Russ).

15. SHanin YuN. Patologicheskaya bol’ i sanogeneticheskoe obezbolivanie. Lekciya dlya vrachej. SHanin Yu.N. SPb.: Sankt-Peterburgskij NII skoroj pomoshchi im. I.I. Dzhanelidze, 2003. 22p. (In Russ).

For citation

Yakimovich A.I., Sizonenko N.А., Surov D.A., Soloviev I.А., Bezmozgin B.G., Babkov О.V., Sviatnenko A.V. Comparative evaluation of different analgesia methods in the surgical treatment of patients with complicated colorectal cancer in a multidisciple emergency hospital. Bulletin of Pirogov National Medical & Surgical Center. 2019;14(3):51-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25881/BPNMSC.2019.13.27.010